Application for execution (5,-666)
You searched for:
Keywords: Application for execution
Total judgments found: 108
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 | next >
Judgment 4077
127th Session, 2019
Universal Postal Union
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The UPU applies for interpretation and review of Judgment 3928 alleging errors of fact, inter alia, and asserts that it is impossible to give effect to the Tribunal’s order to reinstate the complainant. The complainant applies for execution of Judgment 3928.
Consideration 23
Extract:
The Tribunal recalls that an application for review does not suspend the execution of the judgment (see Judgment 1620, consideration 7).
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 1620
Keywords:
application for execution; application for review; suspension of the execution of a judgment;
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
abolition of post; application filed by the organisation; application for execution; application for interpretation; application for review; complaint allowed; reinstatement;
Judgment 4076
127th Session, 2019
Universal Postal Union
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The UPU filed and application for interpretation and review of Judgment 3927 and the complainant in that case filed an application for execution of that judgment.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
application filed by the organisation; application for execution; application for interpretation; application for review; complaint allowed; disciplinary procedure; suspension of the execution of a judgment;
Judgment 4044
126th Session, 2018
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed an application for execution of Judgment 3695.
Judgment keywords
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3695
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint dismissed;
Judgment 3989
126th Session, 2018
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The EPO has filed an application for interpretation of Judgment 3972.
Consideration 5
Extract:
The other questions entail, in substance, a request for an advisory opinion from the Tribunal [...]. However, it is not for the Tribunal to advise the parties with any particularity about what they should do or refrain from doing and whether a proposed course of conduct is in conformity with, or violates, provisions in the Service Regulations. In the event that either party, and the EPO in particular because it is amenable to proceedings against it in a further complaint or other proceedings, behaves unlawfully, the conduct is open to review.
Keywords:
application for execution; competence of tribunal;
Judgment 3986
126th Session, 2018
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed an application for execution of Judgment 3887.
Judgment keywords
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3887
Keywords:
application for execution;
Judgment 3985
126th Session, 2018
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainants have filed an application for execution of Judgment 3883 and the ILO has filed an application for interpretation of that judgment.
Judgment keywords
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3883
Keywords:
application filed by the organisation; application for execution; application for interpretation; complaint dismissed;
Judgment 3895
125th Session, 2018
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed an application for interpretation and execution of Judgment 3694.
Judgment keywords
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3694
Keywords:
application for execution; application for interpretation; complaint dismissed;
Judgment 3826
124th Session, 2017
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed an application for execution of Judgment 3593.
Judgment keywords
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3593
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint dismissed;
Judgment 3825
124th Session, 2017
Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed an application for execution of Judgment 3565.
Judgment keywords
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3565
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint allowed;
Judgment 3824
124th Session, 2017
World Intellectual Property Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed an application for execution of Judgment 3421.
Judgment keywords
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3421
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint allowed;
Judgment 3823
124th Session, 2017
World Intellectual Property Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed an application for execution of Judgment 3225.
Judgment keywords
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3225
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint dismissed;
Judgment 3822
124th Session, 2017
Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed an application for interpretation and execution of Judgment 3507.
Judgment keywords
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3507
Keywords:
application for execution; application for interpretation; complaint allowed;
Judgment 3821
124th Session, 2017
International Atomic Energy Agency
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed an application for interpretation and execution of Judgment 3491.
Judgment keywords
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3491
Keywords:
application for execution; application for interpretation; complaint dismissed;
Judgment 3820
124th Session, 2017
International Atomic Energy Agency
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed an application for interpretation and execution of Judgment 3490.
Judgment keywords
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3490
Keywords:
application for execution; application for interpretation; complaint dismissed;
Judgment 3792
123rd Session, 2017
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed an application for execution of Judgment 3045.
Judgment keywords
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3045
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint allowed;
Judgment 3763
123rd Session, 2017
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed an application for execution of Judgment 3505.
Judgment keywords
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3505
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint allowed;
Judgment 3731
123rd Session, 2017
Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed an application for interpretation and execution of Judgment 3235.
Judgment keywords
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3235
Keywords:
application for execution; application for interpretation; complaint allowed;
Judgment 3724
123rd Session, 2017
International Telecommunication Union
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed applications for execution of Judgments 2551 and 3637.
Judgment keywords
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 2551, 3637
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint dismissed;
Judgment 3723
123rd Session, 2017
World Meteorological Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed an application for execution of Judgment 3348.
Consideration 2
Extract:
WMO […] argues […] that the application is irreceivable because the judgment had been fully satisfied. This argument concerning receivability is unfounded and should be rejected. An application for execution of a judgment is, by definition, premised on the contention that the judgment in question has not been properly executed. Determining whether or not that contention is correct plainly involves an examination of the merits of the application. Hence the receivability of an application for execution cannot be challenged by the defendant organisation on that basis.
Keywords:
application for execution;
Judgment keywords
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3348
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint allowed; reinstatement;
Judgment 3656
122nd Session, 2016
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant filed an application for execution of Judgment 3230.
Judgment keywords
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3230
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint dismissed;
Consideration 3
Extract:
The Tribunal’s judgments carry the authority of res judicata and must be executed as ruled. The parties must work together in good faith to this end. Judgments must be executed within a reasonable period of time. In order to ascertain whether this is the case, all the circumstances of the case must be taken into account, especially the nature and the scope of the action which the organisation is required to take (see, in particular, Judgments 2684, under 4 and 6, and 3066, under 6).
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 2684, 3066
Keywords:
application for execution; execution of judgment;
Consideration 4
Extract:
While there is no evidence in the file to show that Eurocontrol informed the complainant of all the steps it was taking to execute the judgment, this does not signify that it thus acted in breach of the principle of good faith. On the contrary, it must be found that there was nothing to prevent the complainant from inquiring as to what progress had been made with these deliberations before complaining to the Tribunal of an alleged failure to act on the part of the Organisation.
Keywords:
application for execution; execution of judgment;
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 | next >
|