Fund Regulations (447,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Fund Regulations
Total judgments found: 9

• Judgment 1636

  
  83rd Session, 1997
  International Telecommunication Union
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 4

  Extract:

  Under dispute is a decision by the Secretary-General to hold new elections for staff representatives on the ITU's Staff Pension Committee. Although "the executive head took the impugned decision not on behalf of the pension fund but in the exercise of the authority he has, or believes he has, to act for the organisation" the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction because the case is about the Secretary-General's failure to observe Article 6 of the Regulations of the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund.

  Keywords:

  competence of tribunal; decision; election; fund regulations; staff pension committee; staff representative; tribunal; unjspf;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 1034

  
  69th Session, 1990
  Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Summary

  Extract:

  The pension rights of an employee in the United Nations family of institutions are governed by the Regulations of the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund and are determined by the kind of contract he holds. The complainant was employed for a certain time under special service agreements which do not entitle him to membership in the Fund.

  Keywords:

  contract; external collaborator; fund regulations; participation excluded; pension; pension entitlements;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 1026

  
  69th Session, 1990
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 4

  Extract:

  "It is not this Tribunal but the United Nations Administrative Tribunal that hears disputes over the application of the Fund Regulations."

  Keywords:

  competence of tribunal; fund regulations; unjspf;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 990

  
  68th Session, 1990
  International Labour Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 5

  Extract:

  The General Assembly of the United Nations brought in a new scale of pensionable remuneration as from 1 January 1985. The scale, provided for in Article 3.1.1 of the Staff Regulations, did not come into force until 1 April 1985. The complainant's pension, however, was reckoned according to the new scale between 1 January and 31 March 1985. The Tribunal holds that "the ILO is undoubtedly bound [...] by the provisions of the Staff Regulations so long as they remain in force and is therefore liable towards the complainant for the breach of them. That its difficulty is due to the stand taken by the fund cannot alter its liability as employer towards its staff."

  Reference(s)

  Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 3.1.1 OF THE ILO STAFF REGULATIONS
  
  

  Keywords:

  amendment to the rules; difference; effective date; fund regulations; liability; organisation; payment; pension; pensionable remuneration; provision; reduction of salary; scale; staff regulations and rules; unjspf;
  

  Summary

  Extract:

  The General Assembly of the United Nations brought in a new, lower scale of pensionable remuneration as from 1 January 1985. That scale, provided for in Article 3.1.1 of the ILO Staff Regulations, did not come into force for officials serving in the organization until 1 April 1985. The complainant's pension was nonetheless reckoned according to the new scale between 1 January and 31 March 1985. She challenges the Director-General's implied rejection of her internal complaint seeking to have her pension reckoned according to the old scale up to 31 March 1985 or, failing that, compensation. The Organization submits that the measure had come to her attention through various channels and that the complaint was out of time. The Tribunal holds that the Staff Regulations contained an explicit provision which set out the staff's rights. The staff were not told of any valid ilo decision not to abide by the Staff Regulations. The Organization's contention that the complaint is irreceivable is mistaken.

  Reference(s)

  Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 3.1.1 OF THE ILO STAFF REGULATIONS
  
  

  Keywords:

  amendment to the rules; complaint; difference; effective date; fund regulations; pension; pensionable remuneration; provision; receivability of the complaint; reduction of salary; scale; staff regulations and rules;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 866

  
  63rd Session, 1987
  General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 5

  Extract:

  "The Tribunal [...] is not competent to construe the Fund Regulations: by Article 48 the United Nations Administrative Tribunal alone may hear complaints alleging breach of those Regulations."

  Reference(s)

  Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 48 OF THE UNITED NATIONS JOINT STAFF PENSION FUND
  
  

  Keywords:

  competence; competence of tribunal; fund regulations; iloat statute; pension; remand; unat;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 865

  
  63rd Session, 1987
  United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 5

  Extract:

  Vide Judgment 866, consideration 5.

  Reference(s)

  Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 48 OF THE UNITED NATIONS JOINT STAFF PENSION FUND
  ILOAT Judgment(s): 866
  

  Keywords:

  competence; competence of tribunal; fund regulations; iloat statute; pension; remand; unat;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 864

  
  63rd Session, 1987
  International Telecommunication Union
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 5

  Extract:

  Vide Judgment 866, consideration 5.

  Reference(s)

  Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 48 UNITED NATIONS JOINT STAFF PENSION FUND
  ILOAT Judgment(s): 866
  

  Keywords:

  competence; competence of tribunal; fund regulations; iloat statute; pension; remand; unat;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 863

  
  63rd Session, 1987
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 5

  Extract:

  Vide Judgment 866, consideration 5.

  Reference(s)

  Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 48 OF THE UNITED NATIONS JOINT STAFF PENSION FUND
  ILOAT Judgment(s): 866
  

  Keywords:

  competence; competence of tribunal; fund regulations; iloat statute; pension; remand; unat;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 862

  
  63rd Session, 1987
  International Labour Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 8

  Extract:

  Vide Judgment 866, consideration 5.

  Reference(s)

  Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 48 OF THE UNITED NATIONS JOINT STAFF PENSION FUND
  
  

  Keywords:

  competence; competence of tribunal; fund regulations; iloat statute; pension; remand; unat;