ILO is a specialized agency of the United Nations
ILO-en-strap
Site Map | Contact français
> Home > Triblex: case-law database > By thesaurus keyword

Adversarial proceedings (183, 184,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Adversarial proceedings
Total judgments found: 65

< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4



  • Judgment 161


    24th Session, 1970
    World Health Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 3

    Extract:

    Vide Judgment 162, consideration 3.

    Keywords:

    adversarial proceedings; due process; evidence; purpose; right to reply; safeguard; serious misconduct; termination;



  • Judgment 160


    24th Session, 1970
    World Health Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 4

    Extract:

    Vide Judgment 162, consideration 3.

    Keywords:

    adversarial proceedings; due process; evidence; purpose; right to reply; safeguard; serious misconduct; termination;



  • Judgment 159


    24th Session, 1970
    World Health Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 3

    Extract:

    Vide Judgment 162, consideration 3.

    Keywords:

    adversarial proceedings; due process; evidence; purpose; right to reply; safeguard; serious misconduct; termination;



  • Judgment 87


    15th Session, 1965
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 1

    Extract:

    "The complainant's counsel, after the close of the last public hearing, submitted ten documents which had not been communicated to the agent of the organization and upon which he therefore had no opportunity to comment. In conformity with the principle that each party shall be fully heard on all the evidence admitted, these documents were excluded from the dossier on which the Tribunal took its decision."

    Keywords:

    adversarial proceedings; closure of written proceedings; disclosure of evidence; receivability of the complaint; refusal; time limit; tribunal;



  • Judgment 82


    14th Session, 1965
    International Telecommunication Union
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 4

    Extract:

    The interveners submitted a document on 2 April. On 10 April the judgment was delivered, after the public hearing of 6 April. Applications to intervene may be made at any stage; "that does not necessarily mean that interveners are entitled to invoke up to the day of the proceedings any facts, evidence and new documents. [The material document] deals solely with points of law and raises no new points. Consequently [...] the organisation, [which] learned of this legal opinion three days before the oral proceedings began, has been able usefully to discuss the arguments and the conclusions. The [adversarial] procedure has thus been [followed]".

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 61

    Keywords:

    adversarial proceedings; disclosure of evidence; intervention; oral proceedings; receivability of the complaint; time limit;

< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4


 
Last updated: 14.11.2019 ^ top