ILO is a specialized agency of the United Nations
ILO-en-strap
Site Map | Contact français
> Home > Triblex: case-law database > By thesaurus keyword

Amicus curiae (158,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Amicus curiae
Total judgments found: 3

  • Judgment 3395


    119th Session, 2015
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The Tribunal considered that the complainant was entitled to compensation for the EPO's failure to comply with the Tribunal's order.

    Consideration 3

    Extract:

    An amicus curiae brief was also filed in this application. It is also largely aimed at matters beyond the scope of the application and will not be considered.

    Keywords:

    amicus curiae;



  • Judgment 2422


    98th Session, 2005
    International Atomic Energy Agency
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 2

    Extract:

    "The Staff Association has submitted an amicus curiae brief. The defendant is not opposed to an examination of those submissions by the Tribunal, but it points out that the staff representatives raised no objection to the implementation of the new salary scale at the IAEA when they were consulted on the matter. That of course does not prevent the Staff Association from expressing different views, which the Tribunal agrees to take into consideration for the reasons set forth in Judgment 2420 [...] whilst emphasising that these submissions are not to be regarded as the brief of an intervener."

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 2420

    Keywords:

    adjustment; amicus curiae; consultation; icsc decision; intervention; rate; salary; scale; staff union;



  • Judgment 2420


    98th Session, 2005
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 7

    Extract:

    "The Association of Professional Staff has submitted an amicus curiae brief. Although the possibility of gathering the observations of an association or union representing staff interests is not envisaged under its Statute, the Tribunal considers that it can only be beneficial to extend that possibility, as do other international administrative tribunals, to associations and unions wishing to defend the rights of the staff members whom they represent in the context of disputes concerning decisions affecting the staff as a whole or a specific category of staff members. Indeed, the Organization has raised no objection to the Tribunal's examination of the submissions in question, which are not, however, to be equated with the brief of an intervener, and which are simply intended to clarify certain points raised by the complaints with the Tribunal."

    Keywords:

    amicus curiae; general decision; icsc decision; iloat statute; intervention; staff union;


 
Last updated: 19.06.2019 ^ top