< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243 | next >
Judgment No. |
Session No. |
Full text |
3274 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complaint about a post reclassification resulting from an administrative reform was dismissed by the Tribunal. |
3273 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant challenges the decision to place his post in a certain grade group following an allegedly flawed assessment process. |
3272 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant successfully challenges the decision not to appoint her to a vacant post due to procedural flaw and violation of her right to due process. |
3271 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The application for interpretation of Judgment 2938 is rejected by the Tribunal, while the application for execution of the same judgment is allowed. |
3270 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant challenges the date on which her classification in grade G5 took effect. |
3269 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant alleges that she was submitted to harassment and denounces flaws in the inquiry relating to her harassment allegations. |
3268 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant successfully impugns the establishment of a staff report containing negative comments. |
3267 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant impugned the decision not to waive the time limit for lodging an internal appeal, claiming that his heavy workload constituted an exceptional circumstance justifying the grant of a waiver. |
3266 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant successfully challenged the decision not to promote him on the ground that the standard used was too demanding (exceptional performance). |
3265 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant having been allowed to contribute again at the full rate to the pension scheme, the Tribunal need not rule on his complaint seeking the cancellation of the decision to lower the contribution rate. |
3264 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant successfully impugns the decision not to renew her contract after an extension of her probationary period and is granted damages. |
3263 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The application for execution of Judgment 3032 was dismissed by the Tribunal. |
3262 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant, who applied for the position of Legal Advisor, was offered the post, but at a grade lower than that at which it was advertised. |
3261 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The Tribunal considered that the application for execution of Judgment 3036 was justified by the defendant’s delay in executing that judgment. |
3260 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| After divorce proceedings with serious financial consequences, the complainant challenges the refusal to refer to the General Council of the WTO the issue of compatibility between the judgment of the Swiss Federal Court against him and certain provisions of the Headquarters Agreement and the Pension Plan Regulations. |
3259 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The application for execution of Judgments 2830 and 3014 was rejected by the Tribunal. |
3258 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainants argued that their rights of staff representatives had been violated, but their claim for pecuniary compensation was dismissed by the Tribunal. |
3257 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant successfully challenged the decision to offer him a one-year extension of his fixed-term contract rather than the two-year extensions he had previously received. |
3256 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant contests the fact that he was not promoted in 2006 in accordance with the "age-50 rule", which had been abolished as from 1 January 2005. |
3255 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The Tribunal allowed the complaint and ordered the cancellation of the competition in which the complainant had applied. |
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243 | next >
|