Judgment No. 554
The application for review is dismissed.
The Tribunal stated in Judgment No. 486 that "the question for its decision was whether it was within its competence to enforce a rule of policy or practice. The Tribunal found that there was such a rule, but that since it conflicted with a staff rule, it did not create an obligation which the Tribunal was competent to enforce. [...] It is manifest from the judgment that the rule of policy or practice, by whatever evidence its existence was proved, was in this case unenforceable."
Jugement(s) TAOIT: 486
application for review; evidence; applicable law; practice; precedence of rules; staff regulations and rules; provision; difference