Judgment No. 2922
The complaint is dismissed.
"[T]he procedure leading to titularisation was never undertaken in the case of the complainant. It may be concluded from the foregoing that the complainant did not have the status of an established official within the meaning of Article 2.1 of the [ILO] Staff Regulations. It follows that she is not justified in claiming that there has been a violation of the formal and procedural rules applicable to the termination of the appointment of an established official [...]."
Organization rules reference: Article 2.1 of the ILO Staff Regulations
procedure before the tribunal; status of complainant; formal requirements; written rule; staff regulations and rules; breach; termination of employment; formal flaw; procedural flaw; titularization