Judgment No. 1954
THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED.
The complainant unsuccessfully applied for a new post. She maintains that the candidate selected for the post had been considered as an internal candidate during the selection process, when in fact she was an external candidate. "The correct interpretation of Staff Regulation 4.4 is that persons already in the service of the organization have priority only if their qualifications appear to be equal to those of other candidates (see Judgment 107). Since the complainant was found not to be as well qualified as Ms P., she cannot rely on Regulation 4.4. "
Organization rules reference: PAHO STAFF REGULATION 4.4
Jugement(s) TAOIT: 107
staff regulations and rules; appointment; competition; candidate; internal candidate; selection board; priority