Judgment No. 920

• Organization: European Patent Organisation (EPO)
• Date: 08.12.1988
• Original: English
• Judges: Ducoux, Suffian, Gros Espiell
• Full judgment text - Full judgment text (french)

Decision

THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED.

Consideration 5

Extract:

"It is clear form the evidence before the Tribunal that the complainant's objections to the report are unfounded. He knew already, because [his supervisor] had often told him, that his performance was considered poor. The period covered by the report was not too short because the minimum period a report may cover is three months."

Keywords

performance report; period; rating; rebuttal; unsatisfactory service