Judgment No. 584
THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED.
The PAHO contends that because the complainant did not hold a post of indefinite duration, Rule 1050.2 does not apply to him. The Tribunal finds that Rule 1050.2 applies for reasons set out in Judgment 581 (Judgment 581 refers to the reasoning and conclusions in Judgment 470 concerning the applicability of the same rule).
Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 1050.2 OF THE PAHO STAFF RULES
ILOAT Judgment(s): 470, 581
applicable law; contract; post; fixed-term; permanent appointment; abolition of post; termination of employment