ILO is a specialized agency of the United Nations
ILO-en-strap
Site Map | Contact français
> Home > Triblex: case-law database > By thesaurus keyword > measure of distraint

Judgment No. 2773

Decision

The complaint is dismissed.

Consideration 9

Extract:

"While internal investigative reports cannot be the sole basis for disciplinary action against a staff member, they may nevertheless serve as a basis for initiating disciplinary proceedings if they yield indications of irregularities justifying this (see, in this respect, Judgment 2365, under 5(e)). When the organisation concerned initiates proceedings in the light of such reports, it is not itself obliged to repeat all the investigations recorded in these documents, but must simply ensure that the person in question is given the opportunity to reply to the findings they contain so as to respect the rights of defence."

Reference(s)

ILOAT Judgment(s): 2365

Keywords

inquiry; adversarial proceedings; organisation's duties; disciplinary measure; disciplinary procedure

Consideration 12

Extract:

"Nor has the Tribunal found any evidence on file to suggest that the Organization displayed prejudice against the complainant. The circumstance which the complainant cites in support of this contention, namely that he was suspended from his duties on the basis of Staff Rules, cannot be construed in that way, because such a suspension is only an interim, precautionary measure which does not at all prejudge the outcome of the proceedings (see, for example, Judgments 1927, under 5, and 2365, under 4(a))."

Reference(s)

ILOAT Judgment(s): 1927, 2365

Keywords

measure of distraint; provisional measures; organisation's duties; staff regulations and rules; suspensive action; disciplinary measure; disciplinary procedure; suspension; bias

Consideration 18

Extract:

"The Tribunal notes that, even supposing that the complainant could be given the benefit of the doubt as to whether he deliberately took part in the misappropriation of funds, the setting up at his behest of an unsupervised funding system which clearly made such misappropriation possible was in itself an act sufficiently imprudent for it to constitute a serious disciplinary offence."

Keywords

international civil servant; serious misconduct; disciplinary measure; disciplinary procedure

Consideration 25

Extract:

"The Tribunal also notes that the fact - which greatly surprises the complainant - that the UN did not consider it necessary to initiate proceedings against the other staff members whose conduct was criticised by the OIOS has no bearing on the lawfulness of the measure applied to the complainant in respect of the acts of which he is personally accused, since they are proven and imputable to him (see for example Judgments 207, 1271, 1977 or 2555)."

Reference(s)

ILOAT Judgment(s): 207, 1271, 1977, 2555

Keywords

international civil servant; equal treatment; misconduct; serious misconduct; staff member's duties; conduct; disciplinary measure



 
Last updated: 13.03.2009 ^ top