Judgment No. 1736
The complaint is dismissed.
"Of course the first report should have been done earlier and the complainant is right enough to cite Rule 540.1. but [...] he was himself largely to blame for the delay, not having filled up the report form until [a given date]. Besides, his second- level supervisor had told him orally, before putting it in the report, that he was not cooperative enough. It is plain on the evidence that he knew full well that his performance had been found wanting; so he may not properly argue that he was told too late to be able to improve."
Organization rules reference: STAFF RULE 540.1
liability; complainant; delay; duty to inform; staff regulations and rules; work appraisal; performance report; period; date